Site Map Icon
RSS Feed icon
February 08, 2023
Contact Congress!
Enter Zip code:


Jeff Roorda, Business Manager   314-420-3861

if no answer call 314-808-3098 or


Nov 14, 2011

Jul 28, 2011


Mar 01, 2011

Mar 31, 2010

St. Louis Police Officers’ Association Praises Missouri House Vote

ST. LOUIS, MO – (March 31, 2010) – The St. Louis Police Officers’ Association praised the Missouri State House of Representatives today for voting to defeat the “Local Control” initiative that was being sought by St. Louis City Mayor Francis Slay and his supporters.

Proponents of Local Control were looking to have the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department report to the St. Louis City government. The St. Louis Police Officers Association along with the St. Louis Ethical Society of Police and five other police organizations opposed local control because they wanted to avoid direct political intervention in policing matters, among other reasons.

House Bill 1601, which sought Local Control, was sponsored by State Representative Jamilah Nasheed (D-60) and co-sponsored by Steven Tilley (R-106), the House Majority Floor Leader. It was defeated by a vote of 86 to 63. Those voting against the measure cited the fact that the bill was favored by politicians while average citizens and the rank and file were strongly opposed to it.

“We want to thank the Missouri State Representatives who voted against House Bill 1601, because they recognized the need of those who put their lives on the line everyday over the need for political expediency,” said Joe Steiger, vice-president of the St. Louis Police Officers’ Association. “It also reaffirms our belief that the St. Louis City government is broken with too much bureaucracy, too little efficiency and too many elected officials just trying to keep their jobs.” Tampa and Wichita, cities of a comparable size have one-fifth the numbers of elected officials.

“It has been our contention that the City needs to fix its governance first, reform its political system first; and then we can consider Local Control.” Steiger concluded, “Why do the citizens of St. Louis want to entrust police matters into a broken system? Our citizens and visitors deserve better.”

Feb 05, 2010

Press Release - St. Louis Police Officers Association

St. Louis Police Officers Association President Tom Walsh and Vice President Joe Steiger have filed three lawsuits challenging the ballot summary and fiscal note prepared for three different ballot initiatives that would authorize St. Louis City to take control of the St. Louis City Police Department. Two of the ballot initiatives would also allow St. Louis City to take control of police officers’ pension fund.

The lawsuits challenge the ballot summaries prepared by Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan. The suits allege that all the ballot summaries misstate current law by stating the St. Louis City police force and its pension fund are controlled by the state of Missouri. The police force and its pension fund are actually controlled by two separate and independent boards, the St. Louis City Board of Police Commissioners and the Police Retirement System of St. Louis. One of the ballot summaries does not described what effects the proposal will have on police officers’ pension fund. None of the ballot summaries describe all the new, additional powers that will be granted to St. Louis City and its Board of Aldermen if the city chooses to take over the police force and its pension fund.

The suits also challenge the fiscal notes prepared by Missouri State Auditor for these ballot proposals. Under state law, Auditor Montee is responsible for preparing a fiscal note which is supposed to state the costs or savings of a measure to state and local governmental entities. The fiscal notes prepared for these ballot proposals grossly overestimate the savings to the state and St. Louis City that could result from these proposals. The fiscal notes do not consider actual state expenditures on the St. Louis City police force and instead focus on “potential” savings. The fiscal notes also ignore costs that would be shifted from the state to St. Louis City. These costs could include approximately $500,000 that is currently covered by the state Legal Expense Fund.

The lawsuits also challenge the process through which Secretary Carnahan and Auditor Montee prepared the ballot summaries and fiscal notes. The suits allege that these state officials do not provide public notice that they were preparing the ballot summary or fiscal note. Because of the lack of public notice, opponents of the ballot proposal did not have the opportunity to comment on the ballot summaries or provide cost and savings information for inclusion in the fiscal notes as authorized by law.

The cases are Walsh and Steiger v. Carnahan and Montee. They are pending in Cole County Circuit Court where state law mandates these types of lawsuit be filed. The SLPOA is represented by the Stinson Morrison Hecker law firm, which has extensive experience litigating initiative petition cases.


Jan 31, 2010
SLPOA Announces Support For The St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners After careful analysis of the audit performed by Missouri State Auditor Susan Montee (published November 2009), the St. Louis Police Officers Association (SLPOA) wishes to acknowledge the diligent efforts of the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners (The Board)

Page Last Updated: Nov 14, 2011 (09:28:19)
Member Login


Not registered yet?
Click Here to sign-up

Forgot Your Login?

SLPOA Social Media


To purchase a print subscription

of The Gendarme, please click

the link below.

 PA Membership

 PA Upgraded Membership

<< February 2023 >>
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28
Site Search
Site Map
RSS Feeds
Newsletter Sign-up
Sign-up for newsletter & email updates
Saint Louis Police Officers Association
Copyright © 2023, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™

Top of Page image